Ece 320 mod. 5 mini research paper

 

  • Type of paperEssay (Any Type)
  • SubjectOther
  • Number of pages2
  • Format of citationOther
  • Number of cited resources0
  • Type of serviceWriting

Module 5 Mini-Research Paper – Inclusion, the Law, & Adaptations for Young Children with Special Needs Start Assignment Instructions Write a two-page paper discussing (a) definition and philosophy of inclusive early childhood education, (b) what the law says about special education rights and responsibilities for Free Appropriate Public Education, (c) adaptations you see necessary for children with special needs, and in addition to the resources below, (d) locate an additional resource that describes a child’s special education needs. Resources (2017). Early Intervention (Part C of IDEA) (Links to an external site.) (2013). Early Childhood Special Education video (Links to an external site.) Henebry, A. (2012). Peek into early childhood education: Meet Billy (Links to an external site.) Breitfelder, L. (2008). Quick and easy adaptations and accommodations for early childhood students. (Links to an external site.) Paper Requirements Length: 3 pages Double-spaced, 12 point font, 1 inch margins APA Format Submitting Your Assignment Please complete the assignment as a Word document. Click the Submit Assignment button located in the upper right-hand section of the course window. Click the Choose File button. Navigate to your document and select it. Click the Submit Assignment button located beneath the file you chose. Assessment Please refer to the ECE320 Research Rubric Download ECE320 Research Rubric for grading criteria. Outcome Alignment MLO 20 – Define a philosophy of inclusive early childhood education (Aligns with CLO 2) MLO 21 – Recognize what the law says about special education rights and responsibilities for Free Appropriate Public Education (Aligns with CLO 2) Rubric ECE320 Research Rubric ECE320 Research Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Deliverables Addressed 10 pts Exemplary All deliverables provided with exceptional detail. Concepts are utilized and relevant research is provided. 8 pts Meets Expectations All deliverables are provided with good detail. Research is provided. 6 pts Needs Improvement Deliverables are provided yet some detail is missing. No research is provided. 4 pts Inadequate Most of the deliverables are provided. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality Reflection 10 pts Exemplary Challenges one’s own views using thorough analysis, reflection, and inquiry. Explanations are thorough, relevant, and meaningful. 8 pts Meets Expectations Challenges one’s own views using thorough analysis, reflection, and inquiry. Explanations are thorough, relevant, and meaningful. 6 pts Needs Improvement Challenges one’s own views using analysis, reflection, and inquiry. Explanations are relevant and meaningful. 4 pts Inadequate Present, yet does not challenge one’s own views. Lacking in analysis, reflection, and inquiry. Expansion needed for explanations. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis of Situation Philosophy, Law, Adaptations 15 pts Exemplary Thorough and detailed integration of key concepts. Explained concepts in own words and applied by providing examples. 13 pts Meets Expectations Detailed integration of key concepts. Explained concepts in own words and examples are present. 9 pts Needs Improvement Integration of key concepts used. Some examples of concepts are present. 5 pts Inadequate Some integration of key concepts used. No examples of concepts are present. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion 5 pts Exemplary Rationale is sound and backed up with outside information. Detailed and thorough. 4 pts Meets Expectations Rationale is sound and backed up with outside information. Detailed 3 pts Needs Improvement Rationale is sound yet is not backed up with outside information. 2 pts Inadequate Rationale is not sound and the paper is not backed up with outside information. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Writing Readability, APA, presentation of text 5 pts Exemplary Consistently uses grammatically correct sentence structure with no misspellings. Assignment is well structured and formatted. Attributes quotes and paraphrases to source. Has proper reference listing and in text citations to acknowledge sources used. 4 pts Meets Expectations Few grammatical or spelling errors are noted in paper. Assignment is well structured and formatted. Attributes quotes and paraphrases to source. Has proper reference listing and in text citations to acknowledge sources used. 3 pts Needs Improvement Errors in spelling and grammar evident in several portions of paper. Assignment is structure and formatted. Has proper reference listing and in text citations to acknowledge sources used. 2 pts Inadequate Utilizes poor spelling and grammar in most of paper; paper appears ″hasty″. Assignment is not structured and formatted properly. Disorganized. No proper reference listing and in text citations. 5 pts Total Points: 45

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.
×

Contact Us on WhatsApp

× How can I help you?